51黑料网

The package crafted by AZ Schools Now ranges from hiring back auditors and tax collectors who had been let go by the Department of Revenue to requiring all corporations to pay at least $500 a year in income taxes. Dana Naimark, president of the Children鈥檚 Action Alliance, said three fourths of all firms are paying $50 or less.

There鈥檚 also a proposal to require all residents to pay the full basic education property tax, money that goes not only to local schools but also is shared with those districts with less wealth.

Current law allows those living in some areas, such as Sun City, where there are no schools, to pay just half; those living in wealthy districts that don鈥檛 need state aid also do not need to pay the full levy.

Coalition members said that change alone would raise $208 million a year.

But don鈥檛 look for all of these to be embraced by Gov. Doug Ducey, who will trot out his own priorities when the Legislature convenes this coming week.

Ducey got elected in 2014 on a promise to not only oppose new taxes but to reduce individual income tax rates to as nearly close to zero as possible.

Gubernatorial press aide Daniel Scarpinato said, though, that his boss will be proposing more funding for education, though he was not specific on exactly where the governor intends to find the money.

鈥淚 think there鈥檚 a misperception, perhaps, that the only way to increase education funding is to raise taxes,鈥� he said.

鈥淲e believe that it鈥檚 possible to put substantial new dollars in without doing that,鈥� Scarpinato continued. 鈥淎nd our budget will show that.鈥�

He declined to say what the governor considers to be 鈥渟ubstantial.鈥�

But Linda Lyon, president of the Arizona School Boards Association, has an idea of what she believes would meet the definition. Lyon said adding $1 billion to current funding would finally bring teacher salaries in Arizona up to the national average.

Lyon, a member of the Oracle Elementary School District governing board, also derided legislators who, when asked to boost funding, say the state is doing the best it can, what with 43 percent of the budget going to K-12 education.

鈥淚t isn鈥檛 the percentage,鈥� she said. 鈥淚t鈥檚 the size of the pie.鈥�

That goes to the coalition鈥檚 contention that various tax breaks have reduced the state鈥檚 revenues which, in turn, leave less for education.

In the 2007 fiscal year, Arizona collected $9.63 billion in taxes and other income. Last fiscal year, even with inflation, the figure was barely above $9.5 billion.

Some of that is related to the recovery from the Great Recession. But state lawmakers also approved various corporate income tax cuts that this year will mean $350 million less in revenues than would otherwise have been collected.

Beth Simek, president of the Arizona PTA, said all that is taking a toll, particularly on attracting and retaining qualified teachers. She cited statistics showing that 2,000 classrooms were without a permanent, qualified teacher four months into the school year.

鈥淲hen are enough teachers going to be lost?鈥� she asked.

Lyon also said while Ducey and lawmakers boast about not having increased taxes, they鈥檙e not being intellectually honest. What has happened, she said, is local voters are forced to approve bonds and overrides to cover the cost of things that should be the state鈥檚 responsibility.

鈥淭hat鈥檚 money that鈥檚 been pushed down to the local level,鈥� Lyon said. 鈥淭he taxation is still happening.鈥�

Some business leaders have been floating the idea of asking voters for a sales tax increase to fund teacher salary hikes and other education needs. But at this point they want to wait until 2020.

Naimark, however, said that鈥檚 too long to wait. And she said if legislators don鈥檛 make meaningful additions to K-12 funding this year her group and others will push for a ballot initiative in November to raise the funds.