The state Department of Education is warning that schools may not get their $5 billion in federal and state aid next school year unless the governor and Legislature come up with more cash.
Stefan Swiat, press aide to Diane Douglas, said the agency got a one-time $7.3 million this fiscal year for information technology. He said this year鈥檚 request made to the governor through his Department of Administration was for $17.6 million.
And what did Gov. Doug Ducey put in his budget request to the Legislature?
鈥淣othing,鈥 Swiat said. 鈥淶ero dollars. Big fat bagel.鈥
He said this isn鈥檛 a question of asking for new equipment. The IT budget includes not only routine maintenance costs but, potentially more significant, the salaries of the people who operate the computers that figure out how much each school is due.
People are also reading…
鈥淚f we don鈥檛 have a system, schools don鈥檛 get paid,鈥 he said.
Dawn Wallace, the governor鈥檚 chief education adviser, said this was not a purposeful slight.
She acknowledged that Ducey鈥檚 proposal zeroed out the IT line in the agency鈥檚 budget request. But Wallace said it鈥檚 not because the governor believes the Department of Education does not need at least some money.
鈥淭here鈥檚 just a lot in their request,鈥 she said.
鈥淏y their very nature, IT projects are very jargony and technical and they always require further discussion and review through the budget development process,鈥 Wallace continued. 鈥淲e needed to understand what was priority, what was critical.鈥
And Wallace said she has been talking with Department of Education officials as recently as Friday and is sure that something will be worked out to ensure there will be no interruption of payments to schools.
Douglas, in a separate letter to school administrators around the state, said answers are needed 鈥 and soon.
鈥淥ur IT staff will not be reassured about their employment, so we may begin to lose them permanently to other employers, which will cause the performance of the applications they maintain to decline,鈥 she wrote.
Wallace said that the decision to leave the funding out of the governor鈥檚 budget request was not political 鈥 and not related to the fact that Ducey and Douglas, while both advocating for more education dollars, have not seen eye-to-eye on how much is needed.
She pointed out that Douglas, in her prepared statement about the lack of IT funding, said she appreciates that the governor has made education a top priority in his budget. Douglas also said in that statement that many of Ducey鈥檚 ideas are similar to the proposals she made last November.
But in the same statement, Douglas also said none of that means anything if there is no computer system.
鈥淯nfortunately, without any funding in next year鈥檚 budget proposal to support the data system that allow us to collect enrollment information from schools and calculate their allocations, we will soon be unable to process the payments that support Arizona schools, teachers and students,鈥 the superintendent said.
While both are Republicans, Douglas has taken a far more aggressive approach than Ducey to the issue of what she said is a severe lack of funding for public schools.
That has primarily shown up in her request for an additional immediate $140 million for teacher salaries to provide a 5 percent pay hike. Douglas said that鈥檚 necessary to deal with the fact that 20 percent of teachers quit in the first year and another 20 percent are gone by the end of the second.
By contrast, while Ducey has acknowledged a teacher shortage, his budget has just $13.6 million for what would be a 0.4 percent pay hike this year, though he proposes to have teacher salaries increase by 2 percent by 2020.
Douglas also has been outspoken in her call for the state to once again provide full funding for school construction and maintenance, a figure she puts at $280 million. Ducey鈥檚 budget has just $17 million.
鈥淭he numbers are different,鈥 Wallace said. 鈥淏ut that doesn鈥檛 mean that eventually we don鈥檛 want to get to funding more in education.鈥
Anyway, she said, if Ducey were seeking to undermine Douglas or her agency he would not have put $1 million into his budget request to fund 10 employees who otherwise would have had to be let go.
鈥淭hat issue was much more clear-cut because it wasn鈥檛 bogged down with technical jargon and technical complexities,鈥 Wallace said. 鈥淪o we have been a partner to her in this.鈥
Swiat said he is not saying the zeroed-out funding request was done on purpose.
鈥淲e鈥檙e not going to point the finger,鈥 he said. If nothing else, he said, this was 鈥渁 massive oversight.鈥
Swiat acknowledged that the IT request was in some ways more complex than in the past.
He said it included not just $10.1 million 鈥渢o keep everything running,鈥 including the system of sending out state and federal aid to schools but also another $7.5 million to finish a new student data system. But Swiat said all of it is justified.
On Twitter: @azcapmedia

